Walter Russell Mead der skriver i bl.a. Foreign Affairs, New Yorker og Wall Street Journal opsumerer: Global Opvarmning er Død, Dræbt af dårlig videnskab og dårlig politik.
Her er et link - der er billeder og grafik som ikke kan pastes ind her!!!
samt begyndelsen af artiklen:-------
http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2010/02/01/the-death-of-global-warming/ -----------
Posted on February 1st, 2010 The Death of Global Warming The global warming movement as we have known it is dead. Its health had been in steady decline during the last year as the once robust hopes for a strong and legally binding treaty to be agreed upon at the Copenhagen Summit faded away. By the time that summit opened, campaigners were reduced to hoping for a ‘politically binding’ agreement to be agreed that would set the stage for the rapid adoption of the legally binding treaty. After the failure of the summit to agree to even that much, the movement went into a rapid decline. The movement died from two causes: bad science and bad politics. After years in which global warming activists had lectured everyone about the overwhelming nature of the scientific evidence, it turned out that the most prestigious agencies in the global warming movement were breaking laws, hiding data, and making inflated, bogus claims resting on, in some cases, no scientific basis at all. This latest story in the London Times is yet another shocker; the IPCC’s claims that the rainforests were going to disappear as a result of global warming are as bogus and fraudulent as its claims that the Himalayan glaciers would melt by 2035.
Her er et link - der er billeder og grafik som ikke kan pastes ind her!!!
samt begyndelsen af artiklen:-------
http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2010/02/01/the-death-of-global-warming/ -----------
Posted on February 1st, 2010 The Death of Global Warming The global warming movement as we have known it is dead. Its health had been in steady decline during the last year as the once robust hopes for a strong and legally binding treaty to be agreed upon at the Copenhagen Summit faded away. By the time that summit opened, campaigners were reduced to hoping for a ‘politically binding’ agreement to be agreed that would set the stage for the rapid adoption of the legally binding treaty. After the failure of the summit to agree to even that much, the movement went into a rapid decline. The movement died from two causes: bad science and bad politics. After years in which global warming activists had lectured everyone about the overwhelming nature of the scientific evidence, it turned out that the most prestigious agencies in the global warming movement were breaking laws, hiding data, and making inflated, bogus claims resting on, in some cases, no scientific basis at all. This latest story in the London Times is yet another shocker; the IPCC’s claims that the rainforests were going to disappear as a result of global warming are as bogus and fraudulent as its claims that the Himalayan glaciers would melt by 2035.
