EXPOSED: Angelina Jolie part of a clever corporate scheme to protect billions in BRCA gene patents

Angelina Jolie's announcement of undergoing a double mastectomy (surgically  removing both breasts) even though she had no breast cancer is not the...

Ikke angivet Ikke angivet,

19/05/2013

Angelina Jolie's announcement of undergoing a double mastectomy (surgically  removing both breasts) even though she had no breast cancer is not the innocent,  spontaneous, "heroic choice" that has been portrayed in the mainstream media. Natural News has learned it all coincides  with a well-timed for-profit corporate P.R. campaign that has been  planned for months and just happens to coincide with the upcoming U.S. Supreme  Court decision on the viability of the BRCA1 patent.

This is the  investigation the mainstream media refuses to touch. Here, I explain the  corporate financial ties, investors, mergers, human gene patents, lawsuits,  medical fear mongering and the trillions of dollars that are at stake  here. If you pull back the curtain on this one, you find far more than an  innocent looking woman exercising a "choice." This is about protecting trillions  in profits through the deployment of carefully-crafted public relations  campaigns designed to manipulate the public opinion of women.

The signs  were all there from the beginning of the scheme: Angelina Jolie's highly  polished and obviously corporate-written op-ed piece at the New York Times, the  carefully-crafted talking points invoking "choice" as a politically-charged  keyword, and the obvious coaching of even her husband Brad Pitt who carefully  describes the entire experience using words like "stronger" and "pride" and  "family."

But the smoking gun is the fact that Angelina Jolie's seemingly  spontaneous announcement magically appeared on the cover of People  Magazine this week -- a magazine that is usually finalized for publication  three weeks before it appears on newsstands. That cover, not  surprisingly, uses the same language found in the NYT op-ed piece: "HER BRAVE  CHOICE" and "This was the right thing to do." The flowery, pro-choice language  is not a coincidence.

What this proves is that Angelina's Jolie's  announcement was a well-planned corporate P.R. campaign with  carefully-crafted messages designed to influence public opinion. But what could  Jolie be seeking to influence?

...how about trillions of dollars in  corporate profits?