A further element of the redefinition is to change the function of the heads of state who would normally represent their specific G20 countries. GRI recommends that when the G20 heads of state meet, they should see themselves as global managers, not just advocates for their national constituencies.
This argument is similar to one often made in difficult circumstances to national parliamentarians. When they meet at a national or European level, parliamentarians are often called upon to see themselves as national or regional leaders, not just as representatives of their local geographic area. As with the parliamentarians, the G20 heads of state know that they cannot move very far from a national position without risking the loss of domestic political support. Yet the GRI is correct in recognizing that some form of transnational outlook is necessary in order to manage the globalized economy.
But it will take more than a gentle appeal by WEF to change the character of heads of state and government when they are meeting together.
Det er en interessant rapport
http://cdn.umb.edu/gri_uploads/CommentaryThreeSpecialMechanisms.pdf
Eft en gennemlæsning kan man forstå, at vores politikere bliver opdraget/indoktrineret til at være globale ledere, der ikke tænker på dem, der vælger dem.
Hvordan det vil give gode levevilkår lokalt kan jeg undre mig over.
Men EU, FN, Co2 klimaløgn, NSA etc er alt sammen noget der burde diskuteres alle steder, idet de er en del af samme projekt. Global redesign initiative project......Rendyrket fascisme, Cronykapitalisme og korporatisme når det er værst......
